|Synonyms:||pro con, professional con, actor con, actorcon|
|See also:||Convention, fan con|
|Click here for related articles on Fanlore.|
A procon is one run by a professional organization, often for profit. Common examples include ones run by Creation Entertainment and Comic-Con. They often have actors and show crew members appearing which then requires that convention goers pay extra for better seats or an autograph.
Some fans like them for the chances to get celebrity autographs, for the bigger huckster rooms, and variety of offerings. Other fans dislike pro cons for being too expensive, impersonal, and too large to get to see their friends; they instead, prefer fan-run cons.
It's All RelativeOne fan in early 1981 expressed unhappiness with the big Star Trek cons of the time:
Are you as totally fed up with the irresponsible behavior of J. Townsley as I am? I'm referring, of course, to the recent Philadelphia convention fiasco. [Referring to schedule changes with no notification]... in both cases, I suffered considerable financial setback and an even greater degree of mental anguish. I am (to put it bluntly) sick of getting screwed by this turkey, and I want to shoot him down! True, he is the only person who handles pro cons, but his cons are little better than nothing. And surely there must be some way we could stage our own larger-than-fan cons. Townsley's advertising efforts are so pathetic. I would be surprised if we couldn't do better via the grapevine. Perhaps we have legal recourse?... Or perhaps we could stage a boycott in hopes of getting Townsley to improve? I am as anxious as the next fan to get together with friends, especially since I don't live on the east coast where gatherings are common... but I do think we owe it to ourselves to consider alternatives... 
A fan in 1987, presented then with Creation Cons and such, looked back as well:
From a fan in 2010:The Star Trek cons today are nothing like the ST cons of the 70s, in particularly the Al Schuster and the Committee cons. First of all, they were larger, averaging 3000+, and there seemed to be more enthusiasm among the attendees. Even the one-day Mini-Trek cons were fun. Shucks, even the John Townsley ST cons were fun compared to ST cons nowadays. I went to Clippercon in February, and even though I had a nice time, the con didn't have the same electricity, the excitement of the old cons. Maybe I'm just getting old. More importantly, the ST cons of the 70s were fan run cons. With your inexpensive (by today's standards) membership, you got a con shopping bag with lots of goodies: a really nice program book, badge, pocket program, Buttons, etc. .. There were NASA exhibits, guest speakers, and usually at least one member of the cast as Guest of Honor. The dealer's room was good, the art show was decent, and the film program kept you going all night. The con suite was really active, especially after the con. At the 1975 New York ST Con, we had a con suite party that lasted 12 hours! Honest! It started when the con closed at 6:00 pm and I got home at about 8:00 am the next morning. At this party was composed the famous filksong 'Battle Hymn of the Convention'. 
- Stars Getting Rich Off Fan Conventions: How to Take Home "Garbage Bags Full of $20s", Archived version, by Lesley Goldberg for "The Hollywood Reporter" (2016)
- from a personal statement in Universal Translator #7, an opinion that came from a Creation Entertainment member who used take a table and sell Star Trek goods, and memorabilia, who decided to go on his own and become a competitor of John Townsley's Star Trek Conventions (see talk page)
- from Comlink #32 (October 1987)
- comment by Ed Rhodes at The Magic Cafe Forum Index » » Not very magical, still... » » Unicorns are real, October 28, 2010