Anything You Can Write, I Can Write Better -- Fanfiction Awards

From Fanlore
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Meta
Title: Anything You Can Write, I Can Write Better -- Fanfiction Awards
Creator: Merlin Missy
Date(s): December 13, 2007
Medium:
Fandom: multifandom
Topic:
External Links: Anything You Can Write, I Can Write Better -- Fanfiction Awards
Click here for related articles on Fanlore.

Anything You Can Write, I Can Write Better -- Fanfiction Awards is a 2007 essay by Merlin Missy.

It is about awards.

"Competition Brings Out Best, Worst."

Series

This essay is part of a series called Dr. Merlin's Soapbox.

Some Topics Discussed

From the Essay

Fandom comes in a series of natural stages: initial distrust, squee, fanfic, organization, ficathon, fanfiction awards, flamewar, "Yer All Bastards!," new fandom, nostalgia. In future installations of Dr. Merlin's Soapbox, we will be examining this process in greater detail, but for now, our focus is on an event that occurs in every fandom with sufficient fanfic: the awards.

It's human nature to strive for dominance. While considered (incorrectly) in broader society to be a primarily male attribute, women are no strangers to competition, and for all that media fandom tends towards the "sorority of equals" notion, anyone who's been in fandom more than a day will be perfectly capable of pointing out situations of when some are "more equal than others." BNFs are the easiest example to make; we all might be equals in Fandom Q, but while you and I know each other, everyone knows Fan X. There's bitterness in that, oftentimes. (Please see "Fandom as Democracy" for more detail.) After the BNF hierarchy has been established, other fans, usually feeling the best of the fandom has gone overlooked, emerge to try and democratize the kudos [1] given to fanfic. Thus are fanfiction awards born.

Sometimes, the fandom is small, and the awards reach every fanfic written in the fandom. Gargoyles fandom circa 1997 managed that feat, with websites that included code for constant voting on favorite authors, fanworks, and so on. (As in many of these cases, the sites were taken down after people bombed the site with fake votes.) Other fandoms are too big, and either set their own limits or have limits imposed. Alt.Startrek.Creative, the first real home to Trek-based online fanfiction, began running an annual awards ceremony in 1996 (for the 2005 stories) including only stories posted to A.S.C. during specific dates, and organized in categories. Other fandoms tend towards this model, consciously or not: specific posting dates, certain types of stories, posted in certain places (the latter often unintentionally).

In general, fanfiction awards seem to act as rec lists for many fans. Stories that were forgotten, overlooked, or simply not read the first time around are brought back into public attention for a little while, giving readers the chance to find something they might otherwise have missed. But like any rec list, the taste of the reccer is going to distinguish who reads the stories. As one fan said, "I tend to find someone with whose views and perspective of the canon and the characters I agree with, and then pester them for recs. The chances of finding something worth looking at are considerably better."

Fan Comments Embedded in the Essay

[anonymous]: My only experience with fanfiction awards has been in the Harry Potter fandom, and I hate them (the awards). They create huge distances between the BNFs and the average fankid, and it's obnoxious that a great fic can be totally ignored if the author isn't well-known. I've seen authors win awards over other, better fics, just because they're well-known, and I've seen really excellent fics completely blacklisted because the author isn't part of the cabal.

[anonymous]: I've never really much liked situations where for one person to win, another has to lose. And I have never seen a fan fiction awards nominations set that came close to representing the best that category has to offer, probably in large part because of campaigning (a person who provides a link from her work or LJ will get more votes than a person who doesn't; a person who begs for votes will get lots, even if her work is not the best) and popularity (people vote based on much more than just the quality of the individual work under consideration).

[Akino Ame]: Take the latest [awards contest] I was in, where I was an honorary mention. It was an anonymous drop-in by e-mail to the person running the contest. I had no idea it happened or that it even existed. The webmaster e-mailed me to ask if I accepted the nomination, and that was it. Everything was done privately. I didn't know who'd nominated me, who would have voted for me (as the fandom had almost no representation, I didn't have any problems there), or anything to that effect. Contrast with a messageboard I used to frequent in my earlier days of fandom. Members give one another superlatives, and among them is 'best fanfiction writer.' Now, we had been a pretty big board, but there weren't that many people writing. Part of that may have been because of the members who had been pushing for better quality writing (I had been one of them at the time)--in our quest to get better quality fics, I think we scared off a lot of prospective writers. So there was a limited pool to choose from, and worst of all: It was an open forum, and we could see everyone's votes. When I won those contests, I knew exactly who'd voted for me. They had all been my friends in those days. (Ironically, now I've lost contact with them and I don't think any of them remember me -- just goes to show how your fifteen minutes of fame online can fade so easily) In this case, it was very easy to simply vote for your friend. Maybe I really was that good, but I can't be so sure simply because of the public vote.

Yahtzee: The best thing about fanfic awards are that they work to create a reading list of nominations and to attract more readers to stories that somebody has liked well-enough to nominate. Nominations also frequently bring out the generosity of fellow fans.… I have found many wonderful stories through awards or nominations that I might not have read otherwise, so I am grateful for the practice.

[Gray Cardinal]: ...a community of Kim Possible (or "KP") fic writers on Fanfiction.net has been running a set of "Fannie Awards" for the KP fanfic posted there; nominations for the 3rd annual awards will begin soon. Those awards strike me as a good representation of excellent KP fiction; it doesn't hurt that the extended KP writing community overlaps between FF.Net and several independent online sites. By contrast, I've also recently been made aware that the community at .Moon is including Kim Possible fic in the next slate of nominees for its "UFO Awards". I know very little about that community, but based on the short list of KP-related nominees, I'm less confident of their ability to identify and recognize the best work being produced in Kim Possible fandom. .Moon seems more focused on -- and thus probably more literate in -- other fandoms, and I'm not quite sure how to read their inclusion of fandoms outside their core interests in the UFO selection process.

[anonymous]: The thing I like about FF awards best is that it provides me with lots of links to sort through, including some in categories that I normally wouldn't get to see all clustered together like that. (Not many people rec cover art, for example, and there's no central community for viewing it, and very often it gets posted long after I've read the story in question, so whether I see a given cover is mostly down to chance. Awards give me a second chance to see some of the cover art in a given fandom.)

[anonymous]: Fanfic awards can bring out small, unexpected gems of fic or art or graphics and that's always a pleasure to find. On the other hand, a lot of times what some people consider 'good' is not what I consider 'good'. Mostly because the works that people remember and therefore nominate tend to be those that hit their 'kinks' - so people will nominate a certain pairing having sex a certain way, a depiction that romanticises the relationship between two characters whose interaction is canonically conflictual, a favourite canon character Mary Sue'd to be wonderful... There's a difference between 'most memorable' and 'best'. I tend to nominate both that which is memorable to me as well as well-executed. But I've participated and managed awards where the nominations turned out to be mostly friends nominating friends, and I wouldn't have given most of the nominations the time of day. Then again, I am a bit of a fic snob.

[anonymous]: If I'm going to lose, there are writers who I know I should be losing to. When it's instead someone whose work I can't even finish reading, then I lose faith in the voters' ability to have a say on who is best. So when I do win an award, I suspect it's not really worth all that much.… All I know is, there's a reason why the Oscars are considered much more important than the People's Choice Awards.

Fan Comments About the Essay

[Facer]: If I had to say somehting is that most awards systems are not accurate enough to guarantee that the best stories will win. Some do, but not all. For example, I have participated as a judge a couple of times in a contest, made for and by Spanish speaking writers, but regardless of what I or other judges have to say, when the votes come in most of the fics that win did so because of the popularity of the author and not because of the quality of the story. That really bothers me. I have seen excellent stories never get the recognition they deserve because the author is not a MSN messenger adict who spends his days promoting a very bad fanfic. I understand popularity is a huge factor in who gets to win, but it shouldn't be separated from quality.

[justme]: I've been in the HP Fandom for a number of years. The 'awards' are nothing but a joke. I've seen the same people winning again and again just because of who they are and not the quailty of the story that was nominated. This is especially true in the SSHG Awards. I can tell you who of those nominated will win just because of who they are and not how well written the story is. It's sad, but true.

[Shiv]: Awards aren't perfect, but they do generate fannish activity and can lead to undiscovered gems being brought out and given a second chance. Let's face it, sometimes people become favourite authors because they are good writers. It's hard to become one if you're really really dreadful. After that, it's all a matter of personal preferences.

[Doubt]: I have read plenty of stories for the HP fandom, so many of them riddled with Mary-Sues, bad plots, etc., and yet they get so many honorable mentions and positive feedback. Then again, I have only been to Fanfiction.net, but most fanfic authors are not concerned too much with quality work. I've never been nominated, and I tend to be the writer that tags along after her friends and supplies them with ideas and feedback, while my fics go, for the most part, unread. Even though- and I don't mean to brag- I am one of the better writers among my friends, I am overlooked for contests. Most contests are won by the same people over and over, as 'Justme' has stated, and they tend to be rather pointless. I just object to the general unfairness of the popular rule.

[ash]: Each to their own, I say. It is like with a lot of fanfiction -- and fiction in general -- people are going to like what they like. Awards, or no. I've seen people campaign to win various fandom awards (not just fic) I don't personally think that is a good way to go about it. Because then if you have campaigned then how do you know what quality your work really has? Not that it doesn't feel good to succeed without the campaigning part of everything. And then, few people ever say that the Oscars are entirely objective, either.

References

  1. ^ "Kudos" used here predates Kudos at Archive of Our Own.
Retrieved from "https://fanlore.org/w/index.php?title=Anything_You_Can_Write,_I_Can_Write_Better_--_Fanfiction_Awards&oldid=2660456"