"‘Fair dealing for the purposes of humiliation, embarrassment & mockery’ is a bit of a contradiction in terms."
|Title:||"‘Fair dealing for the purposes of humiliation, embarrassment & mockery’ is a bit of a contradiction in terms."|
|Date(s):||December 16, 2013|
|Fandom:||Sherlock, and others|
|External Links:||"‘Fair dealing for the purposes of humiliation, embarrassment & mockery’ is a bit of a contradiction in terms.", Archived version|
|Click here for related articles on Fanlore.|
"‘Fair dealing for the purposes of humiliation, embarrassment & mockery’ is a bit of a contradiction in terms." is a 2013 essay at ef yeah copyright law.
It was created in reaction to Caitlin Moran's Fic Stunt (in which a journalist had Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman read some slash fic aloud at a very public gathering) and An Open Letter to Caitlin Moran (one of the many outraged reactions).
As fans and fanfic writers, we’ve been discussing Caitlin Moran’s objectionable actions at the BBC’s Sherlock screening in requiring Martin Freeman and Benedict Cumberbatch to read a piece of John/Sherlock slash aloud with a slightly different perspective
Ethically, what Moran did was wrong, and that’s been discussed by Midlredandbobbin, the awesome author of the fic in question, on tumblr, on blogs, and on Twitter. (This won’t be the first time she did something awful, btw.)
But legally, did she do anything wrong?
The answer is, under English law, probably.
Ms Moran’s commentary during this portion of the Q&A could [easily] be deemed derogatory, and given what the author said in her posts yesterday, the use of her story in this context can be viewed as a distortion of the honour of the author.
The author did not wish her real name used, so the moral right relating to “being identified” as the author is less relevant than the second right, namely “the right to object to derogatory treatment.” It is clear from the author’s own post on Tumblr that she regards this moral right as having been infringed, and there seems good grounds for her to take this view.
She wrote this story, and others, to share with friends and within the fandom. Is it distorting her honour to take her “writing out of context without permission, belittling it and using it to embarrass actors who I deeply admire”?
As a matter of law, it may very well be.