The practical side of feedback
| Meta | |
|---|---|
| Title: | The practical side of feedback |
| Creator: | Gwyneth Rhys |
| Date(s): | September 28, 2005 |
| Medium: | online |
| Fandom: | |
| Topic: | |
| External Links: | The practical side of feedback (page one); comments page two; Wayback page one; Wayback page two |
| Click here for related articles on Fanlore. | |
The practical side of feedback is a 2005 essay by Gwyneth Rhys.
For additional context, see Timeline of Concrit & Feedback Meta.
Some Topics Discussed in the Essay and Comments
- feedback, desire for it
- feedback, is it owed?
- if a fan doesn't get feedback, they have no idea if anyone likes or notices their fanwork
- feedback as the only currency fans receive
- supply and demand in fandom
- is short, pithy feedback ("I loved it!") better than none at all?
- asking for what you need
- technological ways to search for comments about you on the internet
- feedback as validation
Excerpts from the Essay
Over the years I've heard plenty of arguments about feedback, reccing, and linking -- you probably have, too: people suck and never give it, some authors are drowning in it so they don't need any more to feed their Texas-sized egos, pouty babies use the blackmail of not writing to get more strokes, blah blah ad nauseum. There's an argument about nearly everything having to do with this (and while I consider things like reccing and linking and archiving requests part of the process, as well as concrit, I'm going to use the umbrella term feedback because it's just easier), and sides for every argument. It's emotionally charged, and no two people agree on much, but one thing I never see discussed in all the foamy, shark-drawing, stirring of bloody water are the practical reasons for some form of feedback
It's a natural tendency of a lot of artists (and I'm using this in an overarching manner, too, to include writers, vidders, visual artists, etc.) to use their art to connect to an audience, to communicate what they like or see in their heads, or what have you. I think a lot of artists tend to also judge themselves against audience reaction. We might equate silence with disinterest or our own lameness or something else entirely. My own tendency is to assume that 1) no one is interested in what I do, 2) I suck, and 3) people would say something if they enjoyed it, so they must not have because I suck. In the case of the vids, I just figured all these years that no one really enjoyed them, and they certainly weren't worth resurrecting as digitally remastered vids... I'd already remastered a vid, my first one on computer, to whistling-tumbleweeds in a ghost-town disinterest, and I'm currently remastering another (though really, I don't know why, other than sheer boredom, because it's so irritating I could go postal within the week and shoot my computer in some vidding Elvis frenzy), so neither vid really made me think the frustrating effort was worth it. Without a sense of an audience or people to connect to, I will often go elsewhere, do other things, and judging by the huge response I got to a post earlier this year about how if I have no sense of participation with other people, I will play in another jungle gym or leave altogether, other people share that feeling. A lot.
It isn't that my friends owed me feedback, or that they were obligated to say something just because I created a piece and sent it out into the world. But I had never really thought before that with all the slings and arrows we throw out every time feedback is discussed, the Sturm und Drang every single BNF and feedback and concrit discussion engenders, that the practical aspect is completely ignored. Fandom really only has one currency -- in the real world, in the places I've been published, you can find out about hits, you can get paid by the word, you can find out how many copies sold, etc. There are statistics to give you a general sense of audience interest. Sometimes money changes hands for your art. But in fandom, where we do this for love of the game, audience interest can be judged only by reviews or recs or links or that dread pirate feedback. Without it, we can continue on our merry way, righteous in our conviction that No One Cares and so why should I bother writing more in this fandom/remastering a vid/creating a new Photoshop piece with heds pastede on yay? We end up with a very skewed reality.
There are tons of good and bad excuses for why people don't provide some kind of feedback to artists. And there are tons of fights waiting to happen, and that have happened, over the years about the subject. But I never see people address the fact that without information, we can't reach accurate conclusions about the value of our work, and therefore, the audience could lose out on the thing it wants most. No one seemed interested in the Vice story, including the people I wrote it for, for the longest time; it wasn't till about a year after I did it that I heard from two friends whose writing I love that they'd read it and liked it. So I drew a conclusion, maybe erroneous, but that was all I had to go on before my friends wrote, that there was no interest in the fandom or pairing or what have you, or no interest in me as a writer. I wasn't likely to do the extra work to come up with a new story, flesh out a plot, edit and edit and edit, for no audience -- it was much easier to play where there were other enthusiastic fans to talk to, and any stories I had would keep well in the Tupperware of my brain. No one held out their porridge bowl asking for More, so I went where people did hold out porridge bowls because at least there appeared to be some discussion and involvement about the whole porridge world there. I found out others share this tendency of mine, that their interest often withers and dies without participation and communication.
I hear lots of excuses why people never send feedback, why concrit has largely disappeared, and usually I just roll my eyes and say "whatever" to myself. And I've seen normally sensible people hammer on others for wanting feedback, as if they've gone through Delta force training and think anyone who wants feedback is some mewling pussy who couldn't climb a rope or do a single push-up. Personally, I don't think either side is right, but more importantly, I think they're missing a bigger picture. If we don't say we want more, if we don't communicate the information that something is valued, then the artist may assume silence = disinterest, and we will never see the more we desire from them. This topic will always be about the emotions and the accusations and the rancor to most fans, I think, but I wish more people would be pragmatic about it and see that there's a Spockian, unemotional, just the facts ma'am, logical reason for fans to say something, some way, somehow: We want More, and we're letting you know
And there are always, always people who will gripe about "I loved this, I hope you write more" not being enough, or the ones who complain that art is a gift and they don't owe nobody no stinkin' feedback, and everything in between, but if you look at it pragmatically, solely as a mechanism, it's a way to hit the More button in a world where we really have no other method of getting More
Some Comments
[ cofax7 ]:[Ways to find where people talk and link about you]: LJseek. Also, Feedster and Blogpulse. You enter in your pseud, or your site URL, and it generates a list of citations. Some are to LJ entries (none of them are good about respecting the no-index option on LJ), other cites may be to outside blogs/fora. I found one yesterday on some AOL-hosted journals I'd never heard of before.
Then, of course, there's Google and GoogleBlog, both of which will search by pseud or by URL. Useful stuff!
Yes, I'm a fb ho. It's really kind of amazing how many people do not fb, but then go off and rec. OTOH, I've found myself doing that occasionally, too, so I can't really point fingers.
[ esmaraldo ]:I've been [searching for myself on the internet] recently too. I would have never found out about those recs if I hadn't gone and actively searched for them.
And it's also strange when you talk to people, who you assume don't know anything about you, and they're like "oh yes, you're that artist that drew that Snape pic..." The Snape pic in question is a year old at least.
I'd generally assumed that the people who left reviews were the only ones who enjoyed the art.
[callherblondie]: I think a lot of fanfic readers, especially recently with all the discussion about wanting/needing more concrit, have been led (perhaps erroneously) to think that if they don't give detailed, constructive feedback, they might as well not bother because writers/vidders/fanartists aren't going to get anything out of a comment such as 'I did read/watch/look at this, thanks.' I find those comments helpful in and of themselves because, as you so eruditely pointed out, it does serve a practical purpose which is to inform me that someone is paying attention. Are such comments particularly helpful? Perhaps not in a concrit-type sense but they do serve their own important purpose which is to let fanfic writers/vidders/fan artists know that they are not creating into a black hole. So I always encourage and am thankful for one-line comments telling me that my work has been read. Otherwise, I have no way of knowing whether I should continue (unless my own self-sustained need to continue a story is so overwhelming that I can't not continue a story) to write.
[gwyn r [original poster] replies to callherblondie]: Yup, that's exactly it. And honestly, if you're posting fanfic with the expectation that only con crit, or detailed analysis, is wanted, then a person might want to go elsewhere, because that isn't what it's about. It doesn't mean we shouldn't strive to work better and hear criticism with an open mind, but crikey, that's like asking McDonald's to cook you a perfect filet mignon -- not what they're about.
[klia]:Because I started viding in an era when there was very little opportunity for feedback (TS and I considered ourselves lucky if we could convince anyone we knew to sit down and watch our vids!), any feedback I get is still sort of a shock. It's not something I bank on, because if I did, I would've quit vidding long ago.
Right before VVC, Keiko and I received feedback for vids we made in, like, 1997, so it was quite a shock, but a really lovely one. I didn't resent the person who gave it for not giving it 8 years ago, not by any means! I was thrilled to get it at all. So, I guess, to me, the whole feedback issue is akin to leading a horse to water, and that's just the way it'll always be. Feeling resentful or angry won't change anything, it'll just make me feel worse.
[maubast]:My own tendency is to assume that 1) no one is interested in what I do, 2) I suck, and 3) people would say something if they enjoyed it, so they must not have because I suck.
Ditto. I totally feel that way.
You see, I recently posted a note on one of my older websites, asking people if they still visited (I had no webstats on that particular site) to drop me a note. I uploaded it, and waited... and waited... and got echoing silence. So, therefore, no one must be reading, right? I took the site down, and now I get emails from people asking me to send me stories. WTF. It fills me with a rage - they want something for nothing.
Now, had I gotten just a few notes, saying, 'heck yeah, I still visit the site.', I would have left it up. I wasn't even asking for praise, just an acknowledgement that, you know, there were *people* out there.
[...]
BTW - [...] I DID get the DVD from you, thank you SO much, but I haven't watched yet. I don't want to watch until I can at least say something to you about the vids. *hugs*
[parallactic]:I'm an erratic feedbacker, so I haven't got a leg to stand on. But I agree with this. There isn't a way to tell if anyone's reading if no one feedbacks. I have no perspective on my own work, so my feelings vascillate between work of genius to unredeemable trash.
Interestingly enough, I was thinking of pulling a WIP that I'd a)abandoned, b) had many flaws, and c) was fueled by crack bunnies, d) I wanted to disassociate myself from it, and e) unoriginal--when I got feedback today from someone who thought it was the funniest thing. And now I'm wondering if the fic is salvageable. It's going to be more about completing something, and less about quality, and it's not a popular fic, but now the fic has gained some value. It's gone from unredeemable trash to a status of not bad, and now I'm remembering how much I laughed over writing some of the scenes.
And now I should send feedback to some authors whose stories I enjoyed.
[mgsmurf]:Without a doubt, no feedback for something you like may well equal no more of those types of stories or stories from that author. This would be why I like to give feedback, like to give some details on what I liked as I don't have time to concrit fanfic as a reader. I've tried to read things from authors I like and give feedback, even if a fandom or ship may not be my thing. Some with a fanfic story I think was unique or well done, I like to show I liked it.
If I couldn't read to the end of a bad stor[y] I won't feedback.
[anonymous]:Here from metafandom and no lj!
I assume if I don't get any/much feedback that people aren't interested in my stories. I've still been posting them, on ff.net, in case there are a few lurkers out there who doesn't want to review. Also, as the stories have been finished, and I have been reasonably pleased with how they turned out - why not post?
ff.net logs hits now even if you don't pay for extras. I have been astounded to find my current WIP gets 2 or 3 reviews per chapter and yet comfortably over 110 hits per chapter. Prior to knowing the hits figures, I would have assumed perhaps ten people were reading a story with that number of reviews.
Not only that, I recently found, by accident, one of my stories has been *very* enthusiastically recced in two different places, and yet I had no idea the people making the recs had even read any of my work.
I have been tempted in the past just to send new stories direct to people I know might appreciate them, but it seems I do actually have an audience - an audience that has been totally hidden from me for a long time previously.
So, I'll keep posting. :-)
[...]
ff.net has its faults (some fandom-dependent) but the hits feature is one of its good points.
It's a shame there isn't a method of tracking hit counts on individual journal pages. I have no clue about such matters, but is it possible to incorporate a user-operated hit counter at the end of a story? Something a reader can click on without having to think up some incisive comment, or even revealing who they are?
Like any writer, I'd prefer an actual review of whatever variety, but an idea of number of readers is better than the vast emptiness of cyberspace :-) Not having - apparently - any readers won't stop me writing but it could stop me posting.
Thanks for airing this concern. Let's hope it has a positive impact!
[nellie darlin]:Word. I write fanfic, and I love writing it. My favourite piece got lots of feedback, and I was happy because I was proud of it. But at the same time, I wanted my other stories to get feedback, even along the lines of "I read this!"
There's a sort of taboo about this topic. There's a lot of snobbishness in the fandom, probably related to the "if you don't review I won't write more!" plague, which states that you shouldn't write for an audience, but for yourself. Well, yeah, I write for myself first and foremost, but I want to hear whether it worked! I am not a good enough judge. I need an outside opinion. And if people don't comment, how do I know what they liked and what they didn't? I chose my beta because she was the only person who gave me concrit. I loved it. But second best even to that is the "I read this, I enjoyed it" type reviews.
Does this have a point? Not really, except to show you that YOU ARE NOT ALONE!
[ emmagrant01 ]: Oh, this is so true! I've always said I love any and all feedback, and this is pretty much the reason. Even if it's just an "OMG Squee!!!" it lets me know if people are reading something I wrote. Sometimes the response to something surprises me -- something I thought was good and worked hard on won't get a lot of comments, but something I wrote in an hour and didn't get beta'd will get a lot. It doesn't affect what I write -- I write what I want to write, not what I think people want to read -- but it tells me how what I'm writing might be coming across. It gives me an opportunity to take another look at my own work and think about it in a different way, if that makes sense.
[ozratbag2]:I followed the link from daily_snitch and I found this a fascinating article, so I hope you don't mind if I add my 10 cents worth.
I have to say I agree with your article in the main and it is very well set out. In a nutshell, no fandom community of writers/artists etc would exist if feedback and comments were not made. It's a symbiotic relationship in a great many ways.
I think though that one of the problems with feedback is that it can become a contest of sorts, where writers (and perhaps artists?) use it as a popularity barometer. Perhaps that's just a spot of jealousy on my part, but I have never been afraid of con crit. I thrive on the idea that someone takes the trouble to tell me what works and what doesn't work (politely). That's not to say that I don't enjoy the acknowledgement that comes with a short review that picks up a nuance I've laid out, or simply tells me that someone likes what I'm doing with the characters.
Everyone likes to be appreciated for what they do within any given community, but honestly; and yes I did have to think about it, I still think I'd keep writing anyway because I have to get the bunnies corralled in my mind and then let loose on the unsuspecting fandom I inhabit. ;)
[quivo]: Oh yeah, and why I keep writing: because I love writing. And reading my finished work. Outlining, putting down snippets on paper - it mostly feeds ME.
[wook77]:wow... you sum up exactly what I've been trying to convey to people. Feedback, whether one word or a dissertation is validation. That is what we all want, that someone somewhere validates what we spent our time on. Sure, I write first and foremost for me but I put it out there for others so that they too can enjoy.
I'm with you, I assume, when I don't get feedback, etc, that people think I suck. I try to look at the hit counts but that just sinks me further.
[spark of chaos]: I don't think that I've ever seen a more concise and correct exploration of the matter. Personally I think that feedback is the reason why people create in the first place - to see that you're appreciated, etc, etc. When I do something and there are a few replies afterwards I always feel lied. On my fics I put a note saying "If you don't have an idea what to leave as feedback, just say 'I read it'. It will be enough."