|Country of Origin:||USA|
|Click here for related articles on Fanlore.|
There were fans who found the show appealing because it starred Shatner, and some Shatner was better than no Shatner at all. Some fans tried to find male bonding in the two show's leads, usually coming up short. Others found the politics, coarse violence, and "Dirty Harry-like" attitudes (like calling criminals "scum" and "maggots") intolerable.
Some Fan Opinions
What kind of man do you see Hooker to be? If you mean one who's made a commitment to protect people from the predators of society, then, yes, I'd like him to survive. If, as I believe you see him, an intolerant person whose aim is to dispose of all who disagree with his moral & political views, then I'd hope he loses his power. AND THAT'S THE LAST I WANT TO SAY ABOUT HOOKER; IF SHATNER WEREN'T IN IT, I WOULDN'T EVER WATCH THE SHOW!!! 
The couple of times I have forced myself to watch, it was at best (the episode with Nimoy in it) a mediocre show. And to compare his relationship with Romano with Kirk's and Spock's is...well I'd call that "blinded by the light" of Shatner's personality. 
Sometimes Hooker tends to put one to sleep... in more ways than one!! I do watch the series — it has its good 'moments' but mainly I tune in just to see Shatner. 
I guess the show is beginning to grow on me, though mostly I tune it in just to have a view of Shatner's bod in the background while I'm doing whatever it is I was doing anyway. So I'm a little fuzzy on particular plots and dialogue. Wendy may be right that the episodes are worth watching only once, but personally I find it so hard to tell the re-runs from the first runs that I wind up watching the re-runs anyway. The episodes all seem to run together after a while — the villains are usually black, minority, or third world (I remember one who was Turkish), and the women are usually models, prostitutes, dancers, or other stereotypical female-type roles. There was at least one episode I didn't realize I was watching for the third time until it was almost over. The show's conservatism doesn't bother me so much; I just wish it were intelligent conservatism. I don't expect police officers to think like William 0. Douglas. I think Hooker's attitude toward lawyers is kind of cute (in fact, I tend to agree with him some times) . But it would be more fun to have an intelligent adversary. (After all, I didn't always see eye-to-eye with James T. Kirk, either.)
There are two reasons why I'm uncomfortable with Hooker's bash-the-scum attitude. One is that it makes his character seem some what inconsistent. Hooker is a bit of a boy scout (he wouldn't touch another woman while he was still married to his wife, etc. etc.), and I'd expect him to feel an obligation to uphold the constitution out of the same respect for law, morality and "decency." The other is the way Shatner seems continually to play against the dialogue — "shading the meaning," as he once said about the way he played James Kirk. You keep getting the feeling that one day the show is going to reveal that he's not as simple as he sounds — but it never does.I didn't know that Shatner had been known as a liberal or an activist during the 1960's. I'd be interested to hear more about his activities. I'd always assumed he was fairly apolitical and somewhat conservative. He's said he'd be pleased if Hooker emerged as the "conservative philosopher of our time." I suppose you could take that as an example of what a friend of mine (a Shatner fan) calls his tendency "to bond his own popularity to the characters he plays in an instinct for self-preservation." 
- Beyond Antares 5
- Cops and Robbers and Spies...Oh, My!
- Diverse Doings
- Everything But the Kitchen Sink