[dismiss]
On Fanlore, users with accounts can edit pages including user pages, can create pages, and more. Any information you publish on a page or an edit summary will be accessible by the public and to Fanlore personnel. Because Fanlore is a wiki, information published on Fanlore will be publicly available forever, even if edited later. Be mindful when sharing personal information, including your religious or political views, health, racial background, country of origin, sexual identity and/or personal relationships. To learn more, check out our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Select "dismiss" to agree to these terms.
A Question for the Audience
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Meta | |
|---|---|
| Title: | A Question for the Audience |
| Creator: | Carolyn Cooper |
| Date(s): | mid to late 1986 |
| Medium: | |
| Fandom: | multifandom |
| Topic: | |
| External Links: | |
| Click here for related articles on Fanlore. | |
A Question for the Audience is a 1986 essay by Carolyn Cooper.
It was printed in Blue Pencil #4.
Some Topics Discussed
- subgroups and "the other"
- differences in the audience and content of media zines as opposed to apazines
From the Essay
I recently received a letter from a member of the LASFS APA that brought a matter up for discussion and I need y'alls opinion. This very nice gentleman was on a zine panel at Westercon where BP was recommended by someone else as a resource for zine editors. My heartfelt thanks to the reader with the kind words and publicity, however, when the gentleman wrote to find out about getting BP I honestly wasn't sure what to do. For those of you who don't know about the "other" (non-media) zine fandom, they don't usually sell their zines, they trade or give them away, or at best, ask a nominal amount such as $1-3. Also, APAs and others (like perzines) are generally not big and mimeographed and they don't consider media zines REAL zines because they contain stories instead of articles, gossip/news or personal opinion. In most cases the APAS resemble a more editorially biased version of Interstat, Southern Enclave or Comlink, which is where my dilemma came in. In all good conscious, I felt obliged to point out to the gentleman (who was talking about a possible 10subscriptions!) that BP was geared towards media zine producers and that many of the discussions would be of little use to folks who don't care about pleasing a sub-fandom, who don't worry about money, and who don't give a twaddle about fiction, portraiture or the jadedness of zine buyers. On the other hand, BP does provide cost consciousness tips, news affecting pubbing and help with layout and design. Then I thought about all those newsletter/LoC zines out there in media fandom and said, "Coop, you aren't doing anything for them either. Why aren't you carrying more info on non-fiction writing, on meeting consistent deadlines (I'm certainly not going to tackle that one), on responsible journalism, on the question of whether newsletter/LoC zines should or should not be eligible for awards, on what all goes into doing a newsletter or LoC zine and what the heck is this "other" zine fandom (Will everyone who knows what "corflu" is raise their hands? Thought so.)?"
So here's the question: Part A: Should BP extend its focus to include non-fiction, newsletter/LoC zine oriented articles? Part B: Should BP expand to include issues of the "other" zine fandom (Note: for any of you who like myself are peripherally connected to the "other" zine fandom, I have NO intention of imbroiling [sic] myself or BP in the endless and petty Machiavellian politics and feuds of the "other" fandom anymore than I intend to get involved in any feuds or squabbles in media zine fandom. The issues I'm talking about would be general fannish problems such as integrity in reporting.)?