On Fanlore, users with accounts can edit pages including user pages, can create pages, and more. Any information you publish on a page or an edit summary will be accessible by the public and to Fanlore personnel. Because Fanlore is a wiki, information published on Fanlore will be publicly available forever, even if edited later. Be mindful when sharing personal information, including your religious or political views, health, racial background, country of origin, sexual identity and/or personal relationships. To learn more, check out our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Select "dismiss" to agree to these terms.
yuri theory: a workbook
| Meta | |
|---|---|
| Title: | yuri theory: a workbook |
| Creator: | tshirt |
| Date(s): | Feb 2024 |
| Medium: | print, online |
| Fandom: | Yuri Fandom |
| Topic: | Yuri |
| External Links: | in Yaoi Zine Vol. 3 (PDF) |
| Click here for related articles on Fanlore. | |
yuri theory: a workbook is an essay written by tshirt and published in the third volume of Yaoi Zine, which was themed "Yuri Zine." As the title suggests, it is formatted as a workbook; the reader is meant to answer prompts with pen and paper in order to facilitate their development of their own theory of yuri. In the author's words:
i want to join other theorists who talk about yuri in its own terms. to collectively develop a grammar of yuri, that’s different from just “manga with women and their relationships with each other."
Some Topics Discussed
- What does it mean to say everything is yuri?
- Yuri, pleasure, and Freudian psychoanalysis
- Iori Miyazawa's thoughts on spectatorship vs. self-insertion
- Miyazawa's theory of "strong yuri" and "weak yuri"
- What kind of "gaze" is at play in yuri?
Excerpts
we see in miyazawa’s yuri theories a tension between the simultaneously dehumanizing and humanizing processes that yuri acts upon him.
it is dehumanizing because i the observer am less than human;
it is humanizing because i the writer become human.
is the fantasy of yuri about finding a way to become a person, when you don’t feel like one?
or is the fantasy of yuri the fantasy of a euphoric nonexistence outside of lesbianism (that is, existing only within it)? or both—or neither?
can we imagine a woman who looks at other woman? who simultaneously objectifies and identifies? (so this gaze is twofold: a present gendered observer, with identification/attraction to the gendered object)
now, this is basically the oft-repeated “do i want her or want to be her?” that people throw around a lot. or, rephrased in blakey vermeule’s words, “how do i ‘do’ her?” is this identity play what yuri can come down to?
i don’t want to reduce the question of whether a yuri gaze exists down to simply whether a lesbian gaze exists, though. i think maybe the question i’m really trying to ask here is, as my friend daffy phrased it:
how do lesbians fit into yuri?
A. looking
B. participating
C. objectifying
D. absenting themselves
E. all of the above