Talk:101 Ways To End Up In A Canadian Shack

From Fanlore
Jump to: navigation, search

Does it make sense to include a listing of the 30 fans who contributed to the original challenge (many of them, I suspect, have Fanlore pages already), and then once the 10th anniversary challenge is closed, to edit this page to include a listing of whoever contributes to the new challenge, too? Kass 23:16, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Depends. Are we going to add all the titles and fandoms of the contributions to this challenge? If yes, then adding the author names makes sense. --Doro 00:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Hmm; the more I think about that, the more it seems that it might make the page really unwieldy. So maybe it's not a good way to go. Kass 16:31, 8 January 2012 (UTC)


Wank

I don't even know what to do with this, but there's wank about the use of "Canadian shack." Linkdump: http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/1284691.html, http://fail-fandomanon.livejournal.com/26392.html?thread=116667928#t116667928. --Anenko 02:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC) ETA: Not that I think the discussion needs a huge section in the article, but here's a more comprehensive roundup of links: http://naraht.dreamwidth.org/478950.html. --Anenko 12:53, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Total tangent, but I find it very entertaining how clear it is that several of us wander around ffa and yet none of us breathed a word about here at the "if you recognized someone" thread. :D --Sk 02:37, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Heh. I know several people on my flist/circle visit ffa, and obviously there are some Fanlore editors who do. I wouldn't be able to recognize any of them when they go anon, though. --Anenko 11:45, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
I hadn't seen the f_w material, though I did edit the page earlier today to indicate that while most fans responded to the shack anniversary party with glee, at least one fan took offense. I suppose if there's f_w stuff happening, we ought to add the links to the page -- though in that case I find myself wanting to link also to a few squee posts from people who were excited to see the challenge happen, because I don't want the page to give the overall impression that negative response was greater than positive response, you know? Kass 15:55, 12 January 2012 (UTC)