On Fanlore, users with accounts can edit pages including user pages, can create pages, and more. Any information you publish on a page or an edit summary will be accessible by the public and to Fanlore personnel. Because Fanlore is a wiki, information published on Fanlore will be publicly available forever, even if edited later. Be mindful when sharing personal information, including your religious or political views, health, racial background, country of origin, sexual identity and/or personal relationships. To learn more, check out our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Select "dismiss" to agree to these terms.
Same Actor Crossovers (response to Lucy Gillam)
| Meta | |
|---|---|
| Title: | Same Actor Crossovers (response to Lucy Gillam) |
| Creator: | Shomeret |
| Date(s): | November 25, 1999 |
| Medium: | online |
| Fandom: | N/A |
| Topic: | fiction writing, Highlander, RPS |
| External Links: | Same Actor Crossovers (response to Lucy Gillam)/WebCite[1] |
| Click here for related articles on Fanlore. | |
Same Actor Crossovers (response to Lucy Gillam) is an essay by Shomeret. It is part of the Fanfic Symposium series, and a response to Joxer?!?! And Other Things I Don't Get.
The author asks, among other things: "Maybe Lucy feels that there ought to be "a fence around the law". This is a concept used by Orthodox Jews. They place a metaphorical "fence" around God's commandments by extending the commandments to actions that haven't actually been forbidden."
The Response Essays
- Same Actor Crossovers (response to Lucy Gillam)
- Ares/Joxer? Sure!
- Response to: Joxer?!?!? And Other Things I Don't Get
- Why Joxer and Ares?
Excerpt
I understand Lucy's point that same actor crossover borders on actor slash and/or incest depending on circumstances. I personally am willing to deal with same actor crossover so long as we maintain the fictional context of writing about characters who are definitely different from the actors. It's a balancing act. People who write same actor crossover are tightrope walkers, and there's absolutely no safety net when they fall. If slash writers start bringing in aspects of the actors' lives that don't belong to the characters or even bring the actors into our stories, then it stops being harmless fantasy and becomes something else that is very dangerous. It is dangerous psychologically because perspective is lost. Publishing a fantasy in which a real person participates represents delusional thinking. It is the literary equivalent of stalking the actor. It is also dangerous from a legal standpoint because the actor might rightfully consider such a story actionable. I think that it's also ethically wrong to bring an actor into a slash story as a character. It could cause emotional pain to the actor or to the actor's family. I am ranting a bit about this because someone did bring an actor into a slash story in K/S about a dozen years ago, and I was the only one who felt offended enough to denounce the story in print. I was truly horrified by the irresponsibility of the writer and I hope that I will never see such a thing again. Yet I feel that same actor crossovers are not in the same category. The actor hasn't literally been brought into the story. These writers haven't gone over the line yet.
- ^ Shomeret (1999-11-25). "Same Actor Crossovers (Response to Lucy)". Fanfic Symposium. Archived from the original on 2000-10-28.