Talk:T'hy'la (Star Trek: TOS anthology)

Is this the same zine as T'hy'la?--Aethel 14:30, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Looks like it. The list of K/S zines linking to the other article also lists 1981 as starting date and mentions that it is still published. I don't think there are two long running K/S anthology zines of the same title.--Ratcreature 15:27, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Yep. I moved the content over there and set this up as a redirect. --Arduinna 16:40, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Fanlore:Pre-1995 Fan Name Use: I was under the impression that Gayle F fell under this rule, but her full name is used in this article.--æthel 16:10, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Renaming the page

The reason this wasn't named T'hy'la (Star Trek: TOS zine) before is that there is another T'hy'la Star Trek: TOS zine, a German K/S novel and its sequel. See Talk:T'hy'la. ETA: I would suggest T'hy'la (Star Trek: TOS anthology zine) for the US zine and T'hy'la (Star Trek: TOS novel zine) for the German zine. --Doro 10:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

the "planned for 2009" bit

So now that it is well into 2010 (eeep, March, when did this happen?) it should be known what was published in 2009, and it should be updated. Does anyone know about the new issues?--RatCreature 17:06, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Dates

A few dates seem to be wrong. It says issue #13 was published in 1994 and issue #14 in 1993. --Doro 18:33, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Fixed it. --Mrs. Potato Head 19:01, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

This still doesn't make sense to me. o_O How is it possible that issue #14 was published 5 months *before* issue #13? --Doro 20:19, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

I changed the #14 date to a maybe. Halliday's index doesn't have a date either, but that "October" came from somewhere, and I can only guess the 1993 was supposed to be 1994. Best we can do without an issue in hand. --Mrs. Potato Head 20:26, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

some changes I made

I siphoned off the issue summaries onto subpages. I also moved the fanart reviews out of the captions because they were very hard to read. I'm hoping that there will be more to say about the art in this zine, because the art is amazing, and I think that should get some textual attention. Like this one. Is that done in the style of something? Something about the lacey webby substance seems familiar (and awesome).

I experimented with left justification of images on the subpages, the results of which look great on my browser, but please let me know if it looks messed up on your screen.--æþel 00:56, 14 July 2011 (UTC)