On Fanlore, users with accounts can edit pages including user pages, can create pages, and more. Any information you publish on a page or an edit summary will be accessible by the public and to Fanlore personnel. Because Fanlore is a wiki, information published on Fanlore will be publicly available forever, even if edited later. Be mindful when sharing personal information, including your religious or political views, health, racial background, country of origin, sexual identity and/or personal relationships. To learn more, check out our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Select "dismiss" to agree to these terms.
Talk:Bestiality
I removed an example that looked like someone thought Fanlore was TV Tropes[1]. Unlike TV Tropes, Fanlore doesn't want a list of every example of bestiality that was ever filmed. The page is currently focused on bestiality in fanworks, and the only canon example I can think of off the top of my head that gets referenced in fanworks was the Loki/horse incident. Should the page be renamed to Bestiality in Fanworks? Or should it include a section on what canon bestiality inspired fanworks?--aethel (talk) 00:41, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- I like Beastiality in Fanworks and I think generally we should start naming/renaming pages like that to really show what belongs on the page, because I've noticed a lot of pages where people seem to have added canon information to them as if we're TV Tropes. I'd argue we actually don't need any canon examples at all because that's out of the scope of our wiki and doesn't make any sense. Loki/horse is relevant to Fanlore because fans include it in fanworks, joke about it, discuss it, etc — it's not relevant just because it exists. - Hoopla (talk) 01:58, 4 May 2019 (UTC)