Sarah Z

From Fanlore
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ppovlogo2.png PPOV: Some opinions or a particular focus may take up more space than seems justified by the length of the article or by the issue at hand. Please change and expand the focus by adding to the article and check out our Plural Point of View policy. When in doubt, discuss your concerns on the talk page of the article.
Name: Sarah Z
Also Known As:
Occupation: video essayist, YouTuber
Medium: Youtube, video essays
Official Website(s): YouTube Channel, Twitter
Fan Website(s):
On Fanlore: Related pages

Sarah Z is a Canadian video essayist and YouTuber who creates videos focused on media criticism and fandom histories, the latter being tailored for a primarily non-fannish audience. While not all of her videos about fandom are related to her own fandom history, she is herself a fan and has frequently discussed her time in Tumblr-based Supernatural and BBC Sherlock fandom.

Fandom commentary

Many of Sarah Z's video essays comment on or detail the history of some aspect of fandom, especially (but not exclusively) Tumblr fandom. Some of these essays include:

Responses from other fans

A Brief History of Homestuck
I'm not going to speak to Sarah's character or past videos, but the latter third was a salient indictment of the way people at the top of this fan community have been acting. I agree with basically the whole thing.

Funk McLovin on Twitter.[2]

so Sarah Z's Homestuck video is... really bad? wow that was really bad and extremely disappointing

Callidora on Twitter.[3]

Proshippers vs Antis controversy

When Sarah posted her video Fandom's Biggest Controversy: Proshippers vs Antis in August 2021, some viewers were so outraged[4] that she wound up trending on Twitter. Some commentators felt they already knew Sarah's views on antishippers and proshippers prior to the video; for example, in a few discussions on Fail-Fandomanon in response to the video, anons asserted that Sarah had been involved in wank and subsequently harassed by a group of self-identified proshippers (rainbow meats?), and that she concluded as a result that both sides were equally bad.[5] Sarah herself later said that these assertions (and assumptions) were untrue.[6] While fans on various platforms discussed the merits and shortcomings of the video itself, there were reports that proshippers on Twitter harassed Sarah Z and her editor.

While many people enjoyed the video and defended it as nuanced[7], others criticized it for bothsidesism and perceived misrepresentation of anti-shipping as just one side in a debate rather than a legacy of harassment:

the difference between proshippers and antis that sarah z fails to see is that proshippers emerged as a result of anti harassment, and are so hostile because they’re traumatized. they are not two equal groups. one came first. but she’s biased because she’s been harassed.[8]

Sarah Z's recent video was a mess. If you're actually involved in that space of fandom and know what's actually going on, its so painfully obvious that she didn't do her research OR is extremely biased. People are not mad at her for "calling them out", they're mad because-

She just ignored the abuse people have been facing for years. When this was pointed out, she got mad because the facts didn't point in the direction she wanted.[9]

One side: thinks it's okay to send death threats over fiction
The other: wants people to be free to make art without being harassed or threatened
"Wow, these positions are EQUALLY wrong!"

But how, though??[10]

The video was discussed on fail_fandomanon here. One anon commented, "approaching the anti discourse as if it were a slap fight between antis and proshippers is a mistake. Proshippers rose as a response to antis, a fact that often gets lost in these discussions. While I understand that the conflict may appear to be between two sides, treating it like a ship war is going to erase a lot of nuance and, IMO, miss the whole point of why antis harass people in the first place, as well as how the proshipper's attitudes and behavior developed."[11] warlock4warlock also discussed the video and made similar points. One anon commented, "individual proshippers might be horrible but antis all share a fucked up ideology that promotes bullying".[12]

A smaller group took offense to her "as a tax-paying adult woman"[13][14][15] remark when she explained how she responded to people asking if she was a pro-shipper or anti-shipper, citing it as hurtful and ableist towards disabled adults who could not work and thus did not pay taxes.