Talk:The Daily Dot

So there's been on and off discussion about the Daily Dot covering fandom topics (or any topic maybe) for purposes of clickbait and that they are not actually concerned with journalistic integrity. The Andy Blake thing appears to have restarted the conversation: [1][2]--æþel (talk) 03:31, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm pretty sure that controversy deserves its own section... --Alex (talk) 08:00, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes, yes. I third that. I'm not sure where one would start. A big link dump at the bottom of the article, one that could start as "Further Reading" or "History/Controversy" and hopefully turn into more? --MPH (talk) 12:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)