On Fanlore, users with accounts can edit pages including user pages, can create pages, and more. Any information you publish on a page or an edit summary will be accessible by the public and to Fanlore personnel. Because Fanlore is a wiki, information published on Fanlore will be publicly available forever, even if edited later. Be mindful when sharing personal information, including your religious or political views, health, racial background, country of origin, sexual identity and/or personal relationships. To learn more, check out our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Select "dismiss" to agree to these terms.
Talk:Adaptation
This probably needs examples of debate over movie canon vs. book canon. I know there were a bunch of posts about this a while back over movie!Remus, the movie uniforms, chaser!James vs. seeker!James, and various other things in HP, but I'll have to look for links.--Penknife 19:12, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
I don't think it's rare at all to have book vs. movie issues. LOTR has people on both sides (I'll see if I can track down some discussion). I'd like to reword to clarify that. --Msilverstar 01:02, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- I agree - in my experience the distinction is quite common. --Dora 23:35, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- I've reworded the Film Adaptations of Novels section to try to clarify this -- other people may want to poke at it further.--Penknife 19:05, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
"who may be enticed by familiar or nubile actors," ? I don't think I've ever seen Alan Rickman referred to as nubile before. Maybe attractive? --Betty 22:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- What, RPatz isn't nubile? Or, uhhh, Lynda Carter? Although I can't say there was much thought behind the word, I kind of like the fact that it's a word commonly applied to women, being re-used in its literal sense (marriageable) to apply to men and women alike. --Vee 12:45, 19 October 2008 (UTC)