Template talk:WebsiteRec

@Reviewer: Just because something is a rec site it doesn't mean that it is also a review site. Recs and reviews aren't necessarily the same thing so calling it "reviewer" is a bit misleading. Also, not all rec sites are by just one person, some of them are group projects. --Doro 14:05, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Would you suggest better terminology, or do you think we shouldn't have a field for the site owner(s)/reccers? I guess "Reccer(s)" would work.--æþel 20:21, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

I guess "Reccer(s)" is better than "Reviewer". :) --Doro 10:17, 26 July 2011 (UTC)