On Fanlore, users with accounts can edit pages including user pages, can create pages, and more. Any information you publish on a page or an edit summary will be accessible by the public and to Fanlore personnel. Because Fanlore is a wiki, information published on Fanlore will be publicly available forever, even if edited later. Be mindful when sharing personal information, including your religious or political views, health, racial background, country of origin, sexual identity and/or personal relationships. To learn more, check out our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Select "dismiss" to agree to these terms.
Talk:Standalone
I have a doubt regarding naming conventions - specifically whether one-shot and standalone can be considered exactly synonyms?
From what I gather, a very long story (let's say 50k+) not divided in chapters could qualify as a standalone? But calling this same fic a "one shot" (which is the term that I've "grown up with", fannishly speaking) doesn't feel right. I wouldn't know exactly where to draw the line, but let's say that a one-shot in my fandom circle has always been the fannish equivalent of a short story. The opposite of a one shot would be a long fic, division in chapters of not (but I don't know if other people think only chaptered works are long fics) Edit: apparently this is not a term used in English-speaking fandom, sorry.
Also, I think that what I call one-shot (a not-too-long standalone) is often called ficlet on tumblr, especially if it's an ask fic, which could be considered the tumblr equivalent of a commentfic (this if it gets called anything at all other than "fic", tumblr is pure anarchy with terms). However I've seen a lot of people call that one-shot as well.
Does anyone know something more about how the usage of the term varies across fandoms/platforms, etc? --MyDesperateRomance (talk) 21:57, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- I tried to do a bit of research, and yes, the two seem interchangable, but I'm still unsure about that "Standalone stories may be of any length" bit. However, I'll probably never have the knowledge/skills necessary to do a proper research for this, so I'm just leaving it here, in case anyone can clarify. --MyDesperateRomance (talk) 15:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- I don't agree with "is not part of an ongoing series or shared universe": most of my experience of "standalone" on AO3 has been as a way to differentiate between sequels/continuations that need knowledge of the other stories in the series/verse & those that exist in the same series/verse, but don't need special knowledge of the other fics. E.g. "Can be read as a standalone" & "Sequel to Occam's Razor, but can be read as a standalone.". (This may be where standalone is different than one-shot) -Shannon (talk) 20:34, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, this is the usage of "standalone" that I'm familiar with, too. --Greer Watson (talk) 09:04, 15 September 2015 (UTC)