On Fanlore, users with accounts can edit pages including user pages, can create pages, and more. Any information you publish on a page or an edit summary will be accessible by the public and to Fanlore personnel. Because Fanlore is a wiki, information published on Fanlore will be publicly available forever, even if edited later. Be mindful when sharing personal information, including your religious or political views, health, racial background, country of origin, sexual identity and/or personal relationships. To learn more, check out our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Select "dismiss" to agree to these terms.

Talk:Gamergate

From Fanlore
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This topic is so huge. It's a bit of a cop out to reference Wikipedia, but they've done a super job (242 beautiful footnotes!), and why invent the wheel with that part.

I think what the Fanlore page could add to this is to include links to discussion in the Further Reading/Meta section, to include some Gamergate transformative works: fic/fanart/vids/cosplay..., to provide some links to similar pages on Fanlore (PuppyGate...). What else? --MPH (talk) 19:22, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

News references to Gamergate 2.0

I'm not in video game fandom communities enough to discuss how this might be impacting fandom spaces and I haven't read enough to write succinctly about it either, so if someone is looking to add to/develop a new article for what's happening re: Sweet Baby Inc and how it's being discussed as Gamergate 2.0 by some and various other discussions around it + how they might relate to fandom, here's a link dump:

Cookies and chaos (talk) 10:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

While connected to Gamergate in similar themes, I would say this controversy warrants its own article. Also, divulging into personal opinion, but I don't think this is widespread enough to classify as "gamergate 2" s' that's just me. Pinky G Rocket (talk) 15:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)