On Fanlore, users with accounts can edit pages including user pages, can create pages, and more. Any information you publish on a page or an edit summary will be accessible by the public and to Fanlore personnel. Because Fanlore is a wiki, information published on Fanlore will be publicly available forever, even if edited later. Be mindful when sharing personal information, including your religious or political views, health, racial background, country of origin, sexual identity and/or personal relationships. To learn more, check out our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Select "dismiss" to agree to these terms.
Talk:Fandom vs The Courts: Fan Fiction and Fair Use
Isn't that Meta? The Perspective on Fans cat says it "includes articles on or about the opinions of those involved in the entertainment industry, creators of the original content which fandom transforms, and academics. See Category:Meta for articles about fans' perspectives on fandom." Based in that I would say the Perspectives on Fans cat is probably wrong here.--Doro 22:21, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Will you put it in the right place? Thanks. --Mrs. Potato Head 22:49, 5 April 2012 (UTC) Added: I didn't add Perspectives on Fans, not as far as I know. I just used the Meta template. --Mrs. Potato Head 22:51, 5 April 2012 (UTC) Oh, never mind. I see the problem. Then the Fanworks template is the right one? --Mrs. Potato Head 22:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yep, fanwork template. Though it occurs to me that we could cross-categorize the Meta category under Perspectives on Fans. What say you?--æþel 23:50, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Okay. That makes sense as there is lots of overlap. --Mrs. Potato Head 00:30, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yep, fanwork template. Though it occurs to me that we could cross-categorize the Meta category under Perspectives on Fans. What say you?--æþel 23:50, 5 April 2012 (UTC)