On Fanlore, users with accounts can edit pages including user pages, can create pages, and more. Any information you publish on a page or an edit summary will be accessible by the public and to Fanlore personnel. Because Fanlore is a wiki, information published on Fanlore will be publicly available forever, even if edited later. Be mindful when sharing personal information, including your religious or political views, health, racial background, country of origin, sexual identity and/or personal relationships. To learn more, check out our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Select "dismiss" to agree to these terms.
Talk:Community (journal sites)
This page should be moved to Community (LiveJournal) so that Community can become a disambiguation page. --Doro 18:06, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- How about Community (journal-based fandom), to make it inclusive of all the journaling platforms? --Arduinna 22:31, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Livejournal communities are a feature of the software, not just a fannish phenomenon. How about Journal Community? Or Community (journal sites)? Community (LiveJournal) actually seems the clearest. "LiveJournal" is the name of the software, not just the site.--æþel 23:55, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- I know it's the name of the software, but how many people are actually aware of that? I foresee complaints and "corrections" from Dreamwidth fans, in particular. They can be quite emphatic about the problems with LJ. --Greer Watson 08:45, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- I agree, it would be easy to misunderstand. My favorite alternative is Community (journal sites). --Tiyire 15:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
- Since two people agreed on the same qualifier, I moved it. We can still change it later.--æþel 00:57, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- I agree, it would be easy to misunderstand. My favorite alternative is Community (journal sites). --Tiyire 15:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
- I know it's the name of the software, but how many people are actually aware of that? I foresee complaints and "corrections" from Dreamwidth fans, in particular. They can be quite emphatic about the problems with LJ. --Greer Watson 08:45, 4 November 2012 (UTC)