On Fanlore, users with accounts can edit pages including user pages, can create pages, and more. Any information you publish on a page or an edit summary will be accessible by the public and to Fanlore personnel. Because Fanlore is a wiki, information published on Fanlore will be publicly available forever, even if edited later. Be mindful when sharing personal information, including your religious or political views, health, racial background, country of origin, sexual identity and/or personal relationships. To learn more, check out our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Select "dismiss" to agree to these terms.
Talk:GateFail 2009
Well, I think it fits under Fandom Occurrences, but I wonder whether the Discussion category shouldn't remain also, because it is a discussion after all. But then the "Discussion" category is a mystery to me anyway. I have no idea how it differs from "Debate" (I think I asked that on some Category or sitemap talk page once, but never got an answer). Are we supposed to label specific discussion "debate" then, and use "discussion" to label discussion communities?--Ratcreature 19:47, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe. That's what I've been doing anyway. I never heard back about what the discussion category was supposed to cover, but the Category:Discussion page says it's for pages about Discussion Forums and the art of Fannish Discussion. So I figured it excluded pages about specific discussions, since those are already covered under Category:Debate. If my interpretation is in line with the original intent, I think the discussion category should be renamed to avoid confusion. Along these lines, I think pages like Race and Fandom can go in both debate and discussion categories because they are about a type of discussion, not just specific debates.--Æthel 19:59, 13 September 2009 (UTC)