SDCC 2016: Sherlock & A Case of Sexual Identity

News Media Commentary
Title:	SDCC 2016: Sherlock & A Case of Sexual Identity
Commentator:	Valerie Parker (interviewer)
Date(s):	July 27, 2016
Venue:	online
Fandom:	BBC Sherlock
External Links:	original article, archived
Click here for related articles on Fanlore.

SDCC 2016: Sherlock & A Case of Sexual Identity is the first part of a two-part 2016 interview by Valerie Parker with Steven Moffat, Mark Gatiss, Sue Vertue, and Amanda Abbington about the BBC television show Sherlock. It was conducted at San Diego Comic Con in 2016 and published on With An Accent. The second part was published on July 28, 2016, as SDCC 2016: Sherlock & A Study in Secrecy.

No spoilers of course, given those in attendance! Instead we talked about the challenges of bringing this story to the screen over an extended period of time, with everyone’s schedules being so difficult to navigate, as well as keeping story secrets in a modern age. But what seemed to elicit the most emotion from Moffat and Gatiss, was the frustrations that come from both the press and the fans taking things that have been said by those involved in the production and twisting them to suit their own agendas.

Doing research for the interview, it quickly became clear something major had happened in the Sherlock fandom during the first couple days of San Diego Comic-Con. It didn’t take long to pinpoint the cause of the social media flare up. Moffat was on a panel with Bryan Fuller and Michael Green, discussing the topic of representation – specifically gay representation – in media, particularly in science fiction and popular television. A few comments were being taken by some in the Sherlock fandom as confirmation that a certain ‘ship’ (‘Johnlock’ – John Watson and Sherlock Holmes) would not only definitely happen in the series, and that Moffat had actually confirmed the pair would lock lips in the Season 4 finale. In fact, the fans were congratulating themselves on being right all along. It felt like a major overreach by fans, and Moffat agreed.

Some Topics Discussed

• representation in media
• The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes
• the relationship between fans and The Powers That Be
• fanfiction
• queer subtext (and queerbaiting, obliquely)
• The Johnlock Conspiracy (although not by name)

Excerpts

"What is irksome is what I am talking about is quite a serious thing, a serious question, seriously answered by both myself and Bryan Fuller who managed to answer much more quickly than I did. I was talking about the representation of minorities in science fiction shows and in popular culture. Using the example of talking about gay characters and how you present them. I was actually largely talking about Doctor Who, ’cause Doctor Who addresses children. And I was talking about how do you handle gay characters in a fiction like Doctor Who when you are addressing very directly, children. You do]]n’t want it to be campaigning. You don’t want to be table thumping about it. You don’t want to essentially tell children that there’s something to campaign about. You want to say this is absolutely fine and normal. There is no question to answer. You want to walk right past it, in a way. You don’t want to..If you say, as sometimes other kinds of literature or movies might, we forgive you for being gay. You’re just saying you’re gay and it doesn’t matter. There’s no issue.” “That’s what I was talking about. Was not talking, I was very much specifically not talking about...” continued Moffat, clearly passionate about the topic, and frustrated at the way his words have been twisted, “It is infuriating frankly, to be talking about a serious subject and to have Twitter run around and say oh that means Sherlock is gay. Very explicitly it does not. We are taking a serious subject and trivializing it beyond endurance.”

[Gatiss]: "The whole notion, the idea of them possibly being a couple is inspired by the joke in the Billy Wilder film The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes, our favorite version. And we thought that was a good idea to run with that. In the 21st century it wouldn’t be an issue. People would just assume. Maybe we’ve done it too many times I don’t know. That’s all it is. He explicitly says he is not interested. Doesn’t mean he couldn’t be. Doesn’t mean there’s anything wrong with it. I’m a gay man. This is not an issue. But we’ve explicitly said this is not going to happen – there is no game plan – no matter how much we lie about other things, that this show is going to culminate in Martin and Benedict going off into the sunset together. They are not going to do it. And if people want to write whatever they like and have a great time extrapolating that’s absolutely fine. But there is no hidden or exposed agenda. We’re not trying to fuck with people’s heads. Not trying to insult anybody or make any kind of issue out of it, there’s nothing there. It’s just our show and that’s what these characters are like. If people want to do that on websites absolutely fine. But there’s nothing there."

Moffat concluded, “And I also think in my case, I was talking about representation, as was Bryan, in quite a serious way. What they did was scale back that conversation and make it about something extremely silly. And that’s not helping anyone. I cared a lot about what I said on that panel. I meant it. And I don’t like it being reinterpreted as something else. [We’re] not telling anyone what to think. Mark isn’t saying other people can’t write that version of John and Sherlock getting together. We’re not. We’re not engaging in a clever conspiracy to write something under the radar, we’re just writing the show we’re writing.”

I clarified, at this point in the conversation, “That’s not the story you’re telling.”

“Yeah, that’s it,” Moffat responds. “But they can. They can. Once we hand the show to them, it’s theirs and we’re finished with it. They can do what they like.”

Fan Responses

Examples Wanted: Editors are encouraged to add more examples or a wider variety of examples.