Talk:Broken Images

From Fanlore
Jump to navigation Jump to search

--Ratcreature 13:42, 24 August 2009 (UTC)==full names here?== I didn't create the article. but I noticed that it uses all full names instead of the inital pattern.Is this intentioonal b/c they all use the names online or is this a remnant because this was last edited Oct. 2008 and then the name use policy wasn't applied? I'm just wondering whether I ought to edit or leave as it is.--Ratcreature 11:11, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

it's def. not a remnant, because I've seen it with newer zine articles as well. I that maybe these people might be officially 'out' under their RL names, and the author know that? But then, how would hte casual observer know? So I'd kinda ask for clarification/ a unified policy here, too. (record it as an issue?) --lian 13:33, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm often puzzled as to how to put the naming guidelines into practice with these zines, because so often the zine publisher and all zine lists note the full name on older zines, so they are online plenty, but I have no clue how "intentional" that this on part of the author, and then I also have the problem how to link to online versions of a story that the other archived under an online pseud. I mean, if I link to both the online pseud page (for the actual copy) and the zine publisher page (for the zine reference) then I'm connecting the pseuds in a step short than maybe googling the story title would have done. Like the problem talked on the Dancing Till Dawn zine page, which is a novella and should be moved but I don't know whether to suggest moving it to the shortened name on the zine or to the pseud the author uses on the archived copy at WWOMB.--Ratcreature 13:42, 24 August 2009 (UTC)--Ratcreature 13:42, 24 August 2009 (UTC)