advancededitors, extendedconfirmed, ipbe
7,296
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 140:
Line 140: − +
oh that sentence was referring to an earlier part of the article. reword again
'''Fannish vs Nonfannish'''
'''Fannish vs Nonfannish'''
The Archive is dedicated to fanworks in particular, and is not intended to be a repository of all creative works. However, there are a number of works produced by fans that do not fit comfortably into a narrow definition of fanfiction, fanart, vids, or other types of fanworks. Original works that are not based on a [[canon|specific media source (canon)] are welcome on the archive so long as they are fannish in nature.The line between fannish and nonfannish is recognized to be ambiguous. [[Meta]] or fannish nonfiction essays is explicitly allowed, which some fans feel blurs the line further.
The Archive is dedicated to fanworks in particular, and is not intended to be a repository of all creative works. However, there are a number of works produced by fans that do not fit comfortably into a narrow definition of fanfiction, fanart, vids, or other types of fanworks. Original works that are not based on a [[canon|specific media source (canon)] are welcome on the archive so long as they are fannish in nature.The line between fannish and nonfannish is recognized to be ambiguous. The explicit inclusion of meta in 2013 blurred the the line further in some fan's eyes.
{{Quotation|
{{Quotation|