One True Character
|See also:||OTP, OT3, OT4, BSO, GSF, Pairing, Character Shrine, Character Bashing, The Ray Wars, The Luke and Han War, Spock Shock, Shipping, Monofan|
|Click here for related articles on Fanlore.|
One True Character (OTC) is a riff of One True Pairing (or OTP), a fan's favorite pairing in a fandom. It refers to a person who has a character-based focus, primarily used in conjunction with ship fan fiction, but may also refer to gen fan fiction.
Generally, someone who declares themselves OTC means that they have a strong single character preference, either reading it or writing it. Purists could argue that declaring yourself OTC for a specific character precludes having or declaring an OTP or variation thereof in the same fandom. Extreme purists could argue that OTC refers to one's favorite character in all of fandom as a whole. This is not a common view, but it can be a fun and interesting way to start a very pedantic flamewar with an aca-fan. 
Shows that replace a character with another also create opportunities for extreme alliance. Some examples: the two Robins in Robin of Sherwood and the two Rays in Due South, that latter which sparked The Ray Wars.
Fans may use terms like these to both describe themselves and others: Spockie | Hanfan | Hanatic | Hutchbabe| Kirkie | Starskygirl| Blairbabe | Jimbabe | Doylie | Doyle Devotee.
While not fandom-specific, some fans create pseuds that imply some sort of personal, familial connection to a character or to the actor who plays that character. Some examples may include a fan who calls her or himself "Mrs. Hutchinson," "Mrs. Nimoy," "Jason Skywalker," or "Jennifer Winchester."
Some examples of fans' self-descriptions.
- Avonphiles (Blake's 7)
- Hanatic, Hanfan (Star Wars)
- Spockite (Star Trek)
- Kirker (Star Trek)
- Jimbabe (The Sentinel)
- other examples wanted
Anecdotes of Use
"I think that becoming a fan of any series must begin with one particular favourite."
"At one time, before Slash became the dividing point of Kirk-Spock, there was another strong divider among fen. Most weighed in with one of the two characters. You were either a "Kirkie" or a "Spockie". You loved either Leonard Nimoy or William Shatner. Personally, I always hated this, because I loved, and thought every K-S fan should love, both of them equally. I was clearly the oddball, though. And while "Spockies" also liked Kirk, and "Kirkies" also liked Spock (among relationship fans, that is), it was to a lesser degree and without the undying passion. We used to get stories submitted to Contact where it was clear the writer did not understand the Spock character, because they were totally a Kirk fan, or vice-versa (they didn't understand Kirk because they were a Spock fan). I can only report on what was prevalent mainly within the Kirk-Spock relationship fandom. For the rest of Star Trek fandom, you'll have to search elsewhere."
"By this point, there were many HL fans who considered themselves only fans of Methos, and not the star of the show, Duncan. This was a normal phenomenon, of course. But Kirkies and Spockies, or Bodie fans and Doylies  in Pros were both watching the same show. Methos fans generally only watched the episodes he was in (roughly 20 out of 100 eps.) This gave them a different take on Duncan's character, that the Duncan fans thought was invalid, since it wasn't based on all of the aired source. This led to constant battles over story characterization between the two groups."
"I find it hard to believe that there are readers who have to be reminded that there is more to Star Trek than Spock and Leonard Nimoy. We all have our favourites. Different characters are bound to attract separate followings, but it is all in good fun. The Spock build up was caused by the publicity media, not by the programme which never set out to make Spock more important than any of the others. This was the first thing which struck me when I first watched Star Trek. I expected him to be treated apart, but instead he was no more than a part of an efficient team. I am not directing this to the man in the street, but to the so-called Star Trek fans, who seem to think there is no more to Star Trek than their particular favourite."
"The first, and most obvious fandom which sprang up was the "Spockies" who really threw themselves into loving Mr. Spock. It was a wonderful case of unrequited love, and they loved even that! . . . Later, this unrequited "love" was to manifest itself in a peculiar underground movement of stories about Kirk-Spock relationships."
"Being one of the Blonde One's devoted, I'm delighted by [fiction] that gives him the respect and sincerity he deserves. I'm fed up to the eyes with stories that paint him as less than Loxley."
"A topic I'd like to see discussed in this zine is one that came up at Marian K.'s writers' workshop -- how come so many people write Starsky as a saint and Hutch as a neurotic mess? Granted, Hutch does have weaknesses, but he also has strengths -- and charming as Starsky is, he has a few quirks that make him far from perfect. Besides, if Starsky only kept Hutch around so he could prop up his ailing personality, the relationship probably wouldn't work very well for very long."
- No, no actual people have seriously made this declaration. It's a theoretical construct based on the original and presumed meaning of OTP referring to one's favorite pairing, period, not favorite pairing per fandom.
- from STAG #9
- from Reminisce With Me/The Late '70s
- not to be confused with Watsonian vs. Doylist
- from Duncan/Methos
- The publicity media initially played Spock down fearing religious viewers would react badly to his appearance. It was fan response that led to increased focus on Spock.
- from STAG #8
- from Bjo Trimble's book On the Good Ship Enterprise
- a fan comments in the Robin of Sherwood letterzine Herne's Son #5
- from S and H #16